Why Alice Walker and Michigan Are Both Wrong
Pulitzer Prize-winning author Alice Walker. Image by Getty Images
By Sarah Seltzer August 22, 2013
Alice Walker and the University of Michigan Center for Education for Women — which disinvited her from a speaking engagement at its 50th anniversary celebration, as the Sisterhood’s Erika Dreifus recently wrote about, then later re-invited her to speak at a public forum on campus — are both misguided. It was foolish of Alice Walker to boycott an Israeli publisher because of her anger at Israel’s occupation. But it was wrong, also, for the Center to rescind their invitation because of Walker’s support of Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions against Israel.
How can I stand against them both? Easy. Because I believe academic, cultural and intellectual boycotts in almost all circumstances (with some obvious exceptions) are lazy. They embody people’s fear of having their own opinions challenged by the deep nuances and multi-faceted nature of reality, of art, of the world of ideas. Art is a vehicle for revealing the grey areas of human existence. We should share it as widely as we can, and welcome the way it interrogates us and our dogmas.
I was disappointed with Walker’s decision to avoid allowing her words to be read by Israeli audiences because it seemed a loss — a loss of a chance to foster an exchange that would be helpful to both sides; a loss for Walker to confront the existence and humanity of her Israeli readers and fans, and a loss for those readers to understand Walker’s point of view.
But whether Walker is right or wrong, the folks at American universities should not insulate themselves from thinkers who don’t march in lockstep on Middle Eastern policy. Whether or not supporters of Israel want to hear it, opposition to the philosophy of Zionism is a legitimate intellectual position — and that is true even if some of its adherents are anti-Semitic. Walker’s opponents and Dreifus certainly wouldn’t want all supporters of the Israeli government to be tarred with the same brush as extremely racist Israeli politicians like Avigdor Lieberman. So we can’t dismiss all critics of Israel, even the most virulent, as being the same as those wackos who fulminate about Zionist conspiracies to take over the world.
Both sides have extremists — and those extremists have been far too effective at stalling any sort of concord, even the halting kind. It breaks my heart when conflicts over borders spill over to the cultural realm, a place best suited for building bridges.
A message from our CEO & publisher Rachel Fishman Feddersen
I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s award-winning, nonprofit journalism during this critical time.
At a time when other newsrooms are closing or cutting back, the Forward has removed its paywall and invested additional resources to report on the ground from Israel and around the U.S. on the impact of the war, rising antisemitism and polarized discourse.
Readers like you make it all possible. Support our work by becoming a Forward Member and connect with our journalism and your community.
— Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO
