Skip To Content
JEWISH. INDEPENDENT. NONPROFIT.
The Schmooze

Anderson Cooper Accused Jared Kushner Of ‘Gaslighting’ — Here’s What That Word Means

My tupperware container of old gefilte fish is not making the office smell weird. You have a poor sense of smell, remember? This seems like it’s all in your head. Plus, are you sure you’re not just smelling your own breath? Maybe you smell weird.

This, friends, is an example of gaslighting.

Gaslighting isn’t a new word — it dates to the late 1930’s — but it’s enjoyed an uptick in use and a more central place in public dialogue over the past few years. On Tuesday, CNN anchor Anderson Cooper accused presidential advisor and son-in-law to the president, Jared Kushner, of “gaslighting” over Kushner’s description of Russia meddling in the 2016 election, as well as the Mueller probe.

In an interview with Time on Tuesday, Kushner described meddling efforts by Russia as “a couple Facebook ads.”

“I think the [Russia] investigations and all of the speculation that’s happened for the last two years has had a much harsher impact on our democracy than a couple Facebook ads,” Kushner said at the Time 100 summit.

In reality, Russian interference included more than 10 million tweets, one-hundred thousand Instagram posts, sixty-thousand Facebook posts, and 1,000 YouTube videos, which reached more than half of the eligible voters in the United States, the Huffington Post notes.

Cooper claimed this as an example of “the administration’s contempt for the truth to the point of trying to convince the public not to believe their ears and eyes.” He added, “The word for it, of course, is gaslighting.”

The use of the verb dates back to the 1938 play and 1944 Ingrid Bergman movie “Gas Light.” It’s a psychological thriller about a woman who finds herself married to her aunt’s murderer, who sequesters her and manipulates her so completely that she believes that the evidence she finds against him is, in fact, in her own head, to the point that she feels she cannot trust her own instincts, only his explanations. He even convinces her that the flickering of the gaslight is a product of her own imagination.

Thence the term “gaslight,” which first and foremost has been used to describe a psychological manipulation technique that domestic abusers use against their victims. “Gaslighting is an extremely effective form of emotional abuse that causes a victim to question their own feelings, instincts and sanity, which gives the abusive partner a lot of power (and we know that abuse is about power and control,)” an article from the National Domestic Violence Hotline explains. Psychology Today notes that the behavior tends to assume a pattern — lies, repetition, escalation, codependence, and eventually, control.

The word and concept have crossed over from their use strictly in situations of domestic abuse to a pattern of manipulative lying for the sake of control that can occur in various interactions, on the personal, professional, and societal levels.

Our favorite example is this (apparently non-self-aware) tweet by New York Times reporter Binyamin Appelbaum, who spontaneously announced that people should not use the word “gaslight” since it is not a word:

It’s worth noting that the word “gaslighting” is recognized by Merriam-Webster, Cambridge English Dictionary, and Oxford English Dictionary. Not to mention that the slow evolution of language is the way we get new words.

So now you know. Gaslighting: not just a phrase for millennials anymore! And it never was. Was it?

Jenny Singer is the deputy life/features editor for the Forward. You can reach her at Singer@forward.com or on Twitter @jeanvaljenny

A message from our CEO & publisher Rachel Fishman Feddersen

I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s award-winning, nonprofit journalism during this critical time.

We’ve set a goal to raise $260,000 by December 31. That’s an ambitious goal, but one that will give us the resources we need to invest in the high quality news, opinion, analysis and cultural coverage that isn’t available anywhere else.

If you feel inspired to make an impact, now is the time to give something back. Join us as a member at your most generous level.

—  Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO

With your support, we’ll be ready for whatever 2025 brings.

Republish This Story

Please read before republishing

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free, unless it originated with JTA, Haaretz or another publication (as indicated on the article) and as long as you follow our guidelines. You must credit the Forward, retain our pixel and preserve our canonical link in Google search.  See our full guidelines for more information, and this guide for detail about canonical URLs.

To republish, copy the HTML by clicking on the yellow button to the right; it includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to the Forward. It does not include images; to avoid copyright violations, you must add them manually, following our guidelines. Please email us at editorial@forward.com, subject line “republish,” with any questions or to let us know what stories you’re picking up.

We don't support Internet Explorer

Please use Chrome, Safari, Firefox, or Edge to view this site.

Exit mobile version