Image by Getty Images

By Lior Zaltzman April 7, 2016

Amy Schumer was surprised to see herself in a plus-size issue of Glamour magazine.

@GlamourMag partnered with @LaneBryant to give you a special issue dedicated to your curves! Pick up a copy today!! ?? #chicatanysize #beautybeyondsize

A photo posted by A S H L E Y G R A H A M (@theashleygraham) on Mar 30, 2016 at 11:15am PDT

Forwarding the News

Thoughtful, balanced reporting from the Forward and around the web, bringing you updated news and analysis each day.

Terms(Required)

I agree to the Forward's Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

Email(Required)

The actress and comedienne claimed she was never asked to appear in the issue. But more than that, she was perplexed at having been labeled “plus-sized.”

“Plus size is considered size 16 in America. I go between a size 6 and an 8,” she wrote.

I think there’s nothing wrong with being plus size. Beautiful healthy women. Plus size is considered size 16 in America. I go between a size 6 and an 8. @glamourmag put me in their plus size only issue without asking or letting me know and it doesn’t feel right to me. Young girls seeing my body type thinking that is plus size? What are your thoughts? Mine are not cool glamour not glamourous

A photo posted by @amyschumer on Apr 5, 2016 at 8:18am PDT

While Amy Schumer said there is nothing wrong with being plus size in her post, she wondered whether girls looking at her body and thinking it was plus-sized wasn’t harmful for their self image. “Not cool glamour, not glamourous,” she ended her post.

On Twitter and Instagram, Schumer asked readers for their opinions, and they come in heavy supply.

I don’t think labels are the way to go. Singling women out for their size, and making a point about it is never glamorous @amyschumer

— Juliette Gash (@JulietteGash) April 5, 2016

@amyschumer ‘plus size’ is just another way of splitting us into uniformed groups, putting a label on people’s appearance.

— Kathryn Williams (@KathW80) April 5, 2016

Other celebrities also offered their opinions. , at an event for “The Hollywood Reporter” was asked for her opinion about the controversy.

“I think Amy’s entire thing is trying to sort of like break down barriers and be bold about her own opinions,” Dunham said, “And what I think she was trying to do was stand up for women and say we’re not supposed be categorized in this role, we’re supposed to just be allowed to exist.”

Melissa McCarthy, who is also in the Glamour plus-size issue, posted cheered Schumer on her Instagram, and ended her message of support with a quote from Gloria Steinem:

We have to stop categorizing and judging women based on their bodies. We are teaching young girls to strive for unattainable perfection instead of feeling healthy and happy in their own skin. “Imagine we are linked not ranked.” Gloria Steinem

A photo posted by Melissa McCarthy (@melissamccarthy) on Apr 7, 2016 at 8:44am PDT

And while Glamour has since apologized to Schumer, the whole controversy did make them seen… Less than glamorous.

Schumer joining the important conversation on body image and the arbitrary and harmful classification of women based on their dress sizes, though, was more than enough to make up for it. And she ended the night with a very glamorous video of her flying a kite in a bikini.

Thanks for sharing your thoughts everyone except the people who told me what I “should feel” or what I “should have focused on” ?

— Amy Schumer (@amyschumer) April 5, 2016

Bottom line seems to be we are done with these unnecessary labels which seem to be reserved for women. pic.twitter.com/VUnrgFseRl

— Amy Schumer (@amyschumer) April 5, 2016

A message from our CEO & publisher Rachel Fishman Feddersen

I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s award-winning, nonprofit journalism during this critical time.

The coming year promises to be filled with more complex and historic developments. We are entering an era where independent, fact-based Jewish journalism will be more important than ever. We need to be ready for whatever 2025 will bring, and with your help, we can be.

We’ve set a goal to raise $260,000 by December 31. That’s an ambitious goal, but one that will give us the resources we need to invest in the high quality news, opinion, analysis and cultural coverage that isn’t available anywhere else.

If you feel inspired to make an impact, now is the time to give something back. Join us as a member at your most generous level.

—  Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO

With your support, we’ll be ready for whatever 2025 brings.

$36 $500

$120 $180 Other amount