Skip To Content
JEWISH. INDEPENDENT. NONPROFIT.
The Schmooze

No More Holocaust Movies at the Oscars?

Oscar nominations won’t be announced for another month, but at least one prediction can already be made with confidence: no Holocaust films will be among this year’s major contenders.

Kate Winslet in ?The Reader? Image by Weinstein Company

That’s both a relief and something of a surprise, given the ubiquity of the genre at recent Oscar ceremonies. Holocaust movies haven’t yielded too many actual winners in recent years — Kate Winslet claimed one for “The Reader,” and Christoph Waltz another for “Inglourious Basterds” — but the number of movies was itself sufficient to garner attention, a popularity that could occasionally be uncomfortable.

Awards and nominations for the movies have become so common, in fact, that it’s conventional wisdom to see the films as Oscar bait — a point that’s been made resentfully by Spike Lee and satirized elsewhere by Ricky Gervais. (In Gervais’s case it was with the help of Winslet, which made it seem all the more grubby when she won her first Academy Award for exactly that sort of movie.)

On the one hand, it’s important to keep the genocide in the public’s memory, and films are an effective way of doing that. At the same time, there can also be too much of a good thing — especially when many of the movies are, you know, not actually very good. 2009 was in many ways a low point, with a stream of awards-seeking movies that threatened to exhaust public interest in the subject.

This doesn’t even touch on the complexities of turning the Holocaust into entertainment, however conscientious and high-minded it may be. But after a relative flood of such movies in recent years — “Defiance,” “Good,” “Valkyrie” and “Sarah’s Key” are just a few that spring to mind — it’s nice that the Oscars will take a break this year.

“In the Darkness,” a Polish drama about Jews seeking refuge in that country’s sewers, could end up a foreign-language nominee. But other than that, prizes will probably go to movies about more frivolous topics, such as struggling silent-film stars and dysfunctional families in Hawaii.

That’s probably a good thing.

A message from our CEO & publisher Rachel Fishman Feddersen

I hope you appreciated this article. Before you move on, I wanted to ask you to support the Forward’s award-winning journalism during our High Holiday Monthly Donor Drive.

If you’ve turned to the Forward in the past 12 months to better understand the world around you, we hope you will support us with a gift now. Your support has a direct impact, giving us the resources we need to report from Israel and around the U.S., across college campuses, and wherever there is news of importance to American Jews.

Make a monthly or one-time gift and support Jewish journalism throughout 5785. The first six months of your monthly gift will be matched for twice the investment in independent Jewish journalism. 

—  Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO

Join our mission to tell the Jewish story fully and fairly.

Republish This Story

Please read before republishing

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free, unless it originated with JTA, Haaretz or another publication (as indicated on the article) and as long as you follow our guidelines. You must credit the Forward, retain our pixel and preserve our canonical link in Google search.  See our full guidelines for more information, and this guide for detail about canonical URLs.

To republish, copy the HTML by clicking on the yellow button to the right; it includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to the Forward. It does not include images; to avoid copyright violations, you must add them manually, following our guidelines. Please email us at [email protected], subject line “republish,” with any questions or to let us know what stories you’re picking up.

We don't support Internet Explorer

Please use Chrome, Safari, Firefox, or Edge to view this site.