Skip To Content
JEWISH. INDEPENDENT. NONPROFIT.
Books

South Carolina’s Franklin J. Moses: Scalawag, But No Paskudnyak?

A scalawag may be a nogoodnik or even a paskudnyak, but in the subtitle of Benjamin Ginsberg’s brisk, informed “Moses of South Carolina: A Jewish Scalawag during Radical Reconstruction” from Johns Hopkins University Press, “scalawag” has a more precise historical meaning.

Applied after the Civil War to Southern whites who joined political forces with freed slaves and carpetbaggers (profiteering Northerners who arrived in the South), these scalawags were often despised. Yet few were loathed as lastingly as Franklin J. Moses, Jr., son of a South Carolina judge, Franklin J. Moses Sr. (born Israel Moses). After serving in the Confederate army in the Civil War, the younger Moses was elected Representative and later Governor in Charleston.

Ginsberg convincingly argues that Moses was loathed in part because of his Jewish roots — the press called him “Franklin Moses, Jewnier.” Even worse in the eyes of many Charleston denizens, Moses genuinely liked African Americans and socialized with them at parties which he threw at the governor’s mansion. Ginsberg further explains: “In the face of vehement white opposition, Moses helped make it possible for blacks to attend the state university…If Moses was a robber, what he stole was not so much white South Carolinians’ money as their sense of racial exclusivity.”

Ginsberg further details how, although only a few hundred Jewish families lived in South Carolina at the time of the Civil War, they were widely blamed when crises erupted. The high-ranking Confederate politician Judah P. Benjamin was routinely excoriated by fellow Confederates as “Judas Iscariot Benjamin.” Less eminent Jews like Moses or his friend and crony Francis Lewis Cardozo, a half-black, half-Jewish representative in Charleston, received even more abuse, as detailed in Robert Rosen’s useful “The Jewish Confederates” (University of South Carolina Press.)

Moses died at 68, penniless and cocaine-addicted, but more than any corruption charges, his lasting aura of infamy is because, Ginsberg notes, he invited “blacks to his home — at a time when only black domestics were permitted in white homes.”

A message from our Publisher & CEO Rachel Fishman Feddersen

I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s award-winning, nonprofit journalism during this critical time.

We’ve set a goal to raise $260,000 by December 31. That’s an ambitious goal, but one that will give us the resources we need to invest in the high quality news, opinion, analysis and cultural coverage that isn’t available anywhere else.

If you feel inspired to make an impact, now is the time to give something back. Join us as a member at your most generous level.

—  Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO

With your support, we’ll be ready for whatever 2025 brings.

Republish This Story

Please read before republishing

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free, unless it originated with JTA, Haaretz or another publication (as indicated on the article) and as long as you follow our guidelines. You must credit the Forward, retain our pixel and preserve our canonical link in Google search.  See our full guidelines for more information, and this guide for detail about canonical URLs.

To republish, copy the HTML by clicking on the yellow button to the right; it includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to the Forward. It does not include images; to avoid copyright violations, you must add them manually, following our guidelines. Please email us at [email protected], subject line “republish,” with any questions or to let us know what stories you’re picking up.

We don't support Internet Explorer

Please use Chrome, Safari, Firefox, or Edge to view this site.