What Does Schumer Hope To Gain by Opposing Iran Deal?
What does Charles Schumer want from his — but hopefully soon-to-be-reconsidered — vote against the Iran deal?
We used “distrust but verify” on all arms control deals with the Soviet Union — that is, with an untrustworthy “evil empire” that covered one sixth of the land surface of the entire earth — over decades, and with absolute success. So we obviously have verification procedures down perfectly pat, to say the least. So what is the issue here?
What sort of issue could there be that wouldn’t have just as well stopped all arms deals, any and all and ever, with the Soviet Union?
Even beyond this: From such a vote trying to torpedo the deal, what could Schumer possibly want? To bring on the collapse of world sanctions that the United States could no longer sustain and that would begin to come apart immediately? To start a full-fledged and further decades-long Iran-U.S. Cold War? To humiliate and destroy Iran’s relative moderates and to vindicate and re-empower their comparative hardliners? To let them rush on, without any agreement or sanctions-based restraints, straight to the bomb? Or, if none of this, could Schumer prefer a war?
Hopefully Schumer will rethink — and much more carefully this time — what it is he actually wants to come of this dangerous vote. And then either change his vote to accord with the view of his President and Secretary of State and Party, all of whom he is thumbing his nose at, or explain clearly to the public what result he’s angling for with his vote — other than Iran’s unimpeded rush to a bomb or a war.
James Adler
Cambridge, MA
A message from our CEO & publisher Rachel Fishman Feddersen
I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s award-winning, nonprofit journalism during this critical time.
At a time when other newsrooms are closing or cutting back, the Forward has removed its paywall and invested additional resources to report on the ground from Israel and around the U.S. on the impact of the war, rising antisemitism and polarized discourse.
Readers like you make it all possible. Support our work by becoming a Forward Member and connect with our journalism and your community.
— Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO