Will anything make the world take Hamas’ sexual violence seriously?
In a worldview reduced to victim and oppressor, there is simply no space for Israeli suffering
Friends and family members attend the funeral of Shiraz Tamam, who was killed by Hamas during the attack on the Nova music festival, at Holon cemetery on Oct. 17, 2023, in Israel. Photo by Leon Neal/Getty Images
Laura E. Adkins December 29, 2023
A new report painstakingly documents a campaign of coordinated sexual violence by Hamas in graphic detail. Unfortunately, it’s too little, too late.
The New York Times published a lengthy investigation on Dec. 28 detailing dozens of cases of rape, mutilation and torture by terrorists who infiltrated Israel on Oct. 7. The authors concluded that the targeting of women, men and children “were not isolated events but part of a broader pattern of gender-based violence.”
Although the investigation described specific and horrifying incidents in graphic detail, the general picture that emerged was not a new one. We have known for months that terrorists conducted a coordinated campaign of sexual violence as part of the devastating Oct. 7 attacks that were designed to traumatize and humiliate the Israeli public.
Raz Cohen’s sobering eyewitness testimony on the carnage of the Nova Festival, recounted by the Times? It was first shared by PBS on Oct. 11. Detailed forensic evidence of rape and mutilation? Reuters and other outlets were reporting on that by Oct. 14. Ample first responder testimony? Covered in the Forward and other outlets by Oct. 17. And even that gruesome story of a woman’s breast being sliced off, passed around and played with as she was still alive and being raped? The Times of Israel reported on it a month and a half ago.
Even the overwhelming evidence in the Times investigation is being met with denial and diminishment. Because ultimately, nothing — not a blockbuster investigation, not survivors testifying to the carnage they witnessed, not even substantial forensic evidence — will ever be enough to make Israelis human and worthy of sympathy in the eyes of many.
In a worldview reduced to victim and oppressor, there is simply no space for it.
Israeli pain as a threat to Palestinian suffering
To some, the centuries of conflict in the Middle East can be reduced to a story of oppressor and oppressed.
To one camp, the Palestinians are the world’s ultimate victims, permanent refugees whose entire existence is defined by the Israeli occupation.
To the other, it is the Israelis who must be forever on guard, ever-victimized by Palestinian terrorists and the many states that materially support them.
As of December 2022, 84% of both Palestinians and Israelis reported that they see themselves as “an exclusive victim” in this conflict.
And if either side is seen as the ultimate victim, then almost any campaign of revenge or violence can be justified.
That is one explanation for the horrifying Harvard/Harris poll, conducted Dec. 13-14, in which a majority of Americans aged 18-24 said they considered the attacks of Oct. 7 both “genocidal in nature” and also “justified by the grievances of Palestinians.”
In this framework, pointing out the extent to which sexual violence against Israeli women was minimized — and just how sickening and cruel it was — is seen as a “distraction” from the suffering in Gaza and a right-wing talking point, some contend, as if rape denial will end the suffering of Palestinians.
To acknowledge Israeli pain and suffering in particular threatens the reductive worldview in which victim and oppressor are the only categorizations that really matter. Because if individual Israelis can be victims as well as members of a nation that has occupied another’s territory for decades — and if individual Palestinians can be at once suffer under occupation and be capable of committing horrific acts of terrorism — then the entire house of cards collapses on itself.
It is true that the extent to which sexual violence featured in the Oct. 7 attack was at first unclear. In the attack’s immediate aftermath, authorities’ focus was on identifying and burying the dead with dignity, not fastidiously documenting evidence sexual violence. Delays in reporting the evidence that did emerge allowed bad actors and skeptics alike ample time to spread disinformation and denial.
But even after ample reports concretely proved that Hamas had engaged in planned, systematic sexual violence against Israelis, the reductive victim-oppressor mindset pushed the world to ignore it.
That mindset, we can assume, is why it took the United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women 49 days and an international pressure campaign to issue a tepid post expressing “alarm” (not condemnation) at reports of gender-based violence in Israel and to call for a broader investigation.
And this is also why the NYT investigation was so quickly dismissed by online critics as “rape atrocity propaganda,” mere gossip and blatant lies by anti-Israel actors.
Those who view one group of people as a perpetual victim and the other as the embodiment of evil are bound to ignore any evidence of suffering that does not align with one’s idea of who is the ultimate victim. This erases the complicated experiences of the nuanced individuals who comprise both sides and gets us nowhere closer to a resolution. Reducing one side to “oppressor” and the other to “oppressed,” as the Harvard poll demonstrates, leads to justifying violence extremism, not dealing with the messy business of peacefully solving the problem.
Mirit Ben Mayor, an Israeli police chief superintendent quoted by the Times, chalked the sexual violence of Oct. 7 up to “the hatred for Jews and the hatred for women.”
So, too, is the denial of their suffering. Acknowledging the carnage of Oct. 7 won’t bring any of the victims back, ease the suffering of survivors or do anything to change the fact that war is worse than hell. It will not get us closer to solving the conflict.
But if we can’t acknowledge the documented suffering of innocent victims, even when we find their pain to be inconvenient to our view of the world, we’re in for a very dark future indeed.
A message from our Publisher & CEO Rachel Fishman Feddersen
I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s award-winning, nonprofit journalism during this critical time.
We’ve set a goal to raise $260,000 by December 31. That’s an ambitious goal, but one that will give us the resources we need to invest in the high quality news, opinion, analysis and cultural coverage that isn’t available anywhere else.
If you feel inspired to make an impact, now is the time to give something back. Join us as a member at your most generous level.
— Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO
