MARCH 09: Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) participates in a coronavirus public health roundtable with healthcare professionals including Dr. Alison Galvani (L) as he continues his campaign swing through the Midwest on March 09, 2020 in Detroit, Michigan. Michigan will hold its primary election tomorrow. (Photo by Scott Olson/Getty Images) Image by Getty Images

Former Vice President Joe Biden may be the frontrunner in the Democratic presidential primaries, but the race has already largely been shaped by another candidate: Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders, whose domestic policies represent the most progressive economic platform in generations.

Like Hillary Clinton in 2016, the former vice president has a clear advantage over Sanders on foreign policy and national security — issues that will receive increasing scrutiny as the general election approaches.

But Sanders has something Biden doesn’t: He is as bold on foreign policy as he is on economics, pledging to prioritize human rights and diplomacy as Commander in Chief. From the War on Terror to US support for Saudi Arabia, he has for decades challenged the Washington consensus. A Sanders presidency would have a profound impact on an array of American foreign policy issues.

Forwarding the News

Thoughtful, balanced reporting from the Forward and around the web, bringing you updated news and analysis of the crisis each day.

Terms(Required)

I agree to the Forward's Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

Email(Required)

This is no less the case in respect to US leadership on Israel-Palestine. In this arena, the diplomatic efforts of the last two administrations have been defined by animosity. President Obama’s relationship with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was strained, and Trump’s one-sided pro-Israel agenda has made it a point to antagonize Palestinians, moving the embassy to Jerusalem, withdrawing aid to the Palestinians, recognizing other disputed territories as part of Israel and proposing a peace plan without Palestinian input.

This contrasts with the achievements of Jimmy Carter, and later Bill Clinton, who brought Israel and its adversaries together for peace talks. Clinton’s Camp David summit ended without a deal but made huge strides toward one.

And Sanders’ neutral approach is reminiscent of Clinton’s, calling for Israeli and Palestinian leaderships to once again sit down for negotiations.

While Sanders lacks Biden’s White House experience, he does have a personal perspective unlike any presidential contender. Having grown up in an immigrant family affected by the Holocaust, and having lived on an Israeli kibbutz as a young man, Sanders’ view of the conflict is distinctly influenced by his Jewish identity and recognition of anti-Semitism. His viewpoint is in line with the labor and liberal Zionist traditions, which believe in a secure Palestinian state as much they do in a democratic, multicultural Jewish homeland.

Though he would be the first Jewish president, Sanders would undoubtedly receive a frosty reception from Benjamin Netanyahu, whose policies he has condemned as racist and reactionary. Nor has he endeared himself to the Israeli right by boycotting AIPAC conferences, or by condemning humanitarian suffering in Gaza and West Bank annexation plans, and suggesting that US military aid could be used as leverage for Israel to change course and enter peace talks.

But Sanders has no less harshly deplored terror attacks in Israel by the likes of Hamas, and as sympathetic as he is to the Palestinian cause, he also unequivocally defends Israel’s right to exist — rejecting a more radical one-state solution on this basis. His commitment to restore US aid to the Palestinian Authority is tempered by a critique of its corruption and links to extremism, which suggests he might use aid to also leverage the Palestinian leadership, too.

Over his 30 years in the US Congress, Sanders has built a reputation for being a pragmatic and effective negotiator who, despite his bad-tempered public image, is able to compromise and work across party lines. As much as Sanders is an idealist, he is also a realist in his pursuit of overarching goals.

Sanders is well-prepared to be the next Bill Clinton. His strategic abilities are accompanied by an even-handed, and compassionate, view of both sides and their national histories.

Of course, he might have more success if a leader like Benny Gantz — who has shown openness to fresh peace talks with the PA — were to replace Netanyahu. But there is nothing in Sanders’s record to suggest he would back down from tougher discussions.

The task at hand cannot be underestimated, but Sanders has proven himself to be an ideal candidate for the role of peacemaker.

Jacob Richardson is a freelance writer based in the U.K. You can follow him on Twitter @jjarichardson.

A message from our CEO & publisher Rachel Fishman Feddersen

I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s award-winning, nonprofit journalism during this critical time.

Now more than ever, American Jews need independent news they can trust, with reporting driven by truth, not ideology. We serve you, not any ideological agenda

At a time when other newsrooms are closing or cutting back, the Forward has removed its paywall and invested additional resources to report on the ground from Israel and around the U.S. on the impact of the war, rising antisemitism and polarized discourse..

Readers like you make it all possible. Support our work by becoming a Forward Member and connect with our journalism and your community.

—  Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO

Join our mission to tell the Jewish story fully and fairly.

$36 $500

$120 $180 Other amount