Skip To Content
JEWISH. INDEPENDENT. NONPROFIT.
Back to Opinion

How Israel Brought U.N. Resolution on Itself With Irrational Settlement Push

The controversy over the U.S. decision to abstain rather than veto a UN Resolution supported by every other member of the Security Council diverts attention from the most important threat to a secure future for Israel.

The single path forward for Israel to maintain its status as both Jewish and democratic is to realize upon the dream of two states for two peoples. The Palestinians have not made this easy. Whether through incitement, terrorism, stubbornness or poor judgment it does seem as if, to quote the legendary Israeli diplomat Abba Eban, the Palestinians “have never missed an opportunity to miss an opportunity.”

That one can legitimately question whether the Palestinians are ready partners for peace, however, provides no excuse for foreclosing the possibility of the only option that is in Israel’s interest. As a lifelong Zionist, that the implementation of the two state policy poses a difficult challenge is simply another obstacle to be overcome. Ben Gurion would be ashamed by the failure of Israel’s current leadership to find an innovative solution. The challenges encountered by Israel’s original generation, which were overcome, were much more difficult than those Israel faces today when it is well established and possesses the most powerful military in the region.

Yet Israel’s government is working nonstop to implement a policy which inevitably weakens the Jewish state. There is no dispute over the underlying facts recited by the United States in connection with its decision to abstain on the Security Council vote on Resolution 2334. For all of the over the top criticism of the United States, I have yet to see any denial of the statistics regarding settlement growth, numbers that the Israeli government and Jewish leadership avoid acknowledging.

Nearly 90,000 Israelis have taken up residence beyond the security barrier that Israel established to protect the settlement blocs it understandably intends to retain in a negotiated solution. This number has expanded by some 20,000 since 2009. And the future looks bleaker, with essential members of Israel’s governing coalition announcing an intent to accelerate building and the support of Prime Minister Netanyahu for the so called Regularization Bill that would retroactively legalize outposts previously deemed illegal under Israel’s own laws.

Yes, U.N. Resolution 2334 does not distinguish between those settlements inside and outside of the settlement blocs. But that is the result of Israel itself refusing to make this distinction. And critics are correct to be concerned that the Security Council provides encouragement to the Palestinians to avoid direct negotiations. Nevertheless, a veto of Resolution 2334 would have sent an unmistakable signal to Israel’s pro-settlement wing, including the ruling coalition, that it can act without restraint. Israel’s conduct since the U.S. veto of a similar resolution in 2011 is all the proof one needs.

Those who care about the Jewish homeland must acknowledge that ongoing settlement expansion of this sort severely damages Israel’s future. The focus should be on implementing solutions that protect Israel’s security. The recent report by Commanders for Israel’s Security provides a serious proposal in this regard as does a paper issued by the Center for a New American Security. We should be discussing these solutions rather than complaining that a self-defeating expansion policy is being exposed.

The time has come to stop making excuses by pointing at others to escape the responsibility that Zionism imposes upon us to take control of our own destiny. The story of the Jewish people is not merely that we have always had enemies, but rather that we have had the ingenuity and strength — usually unconventional — to defeat them. Let us hope that the lights of the Hanukkah miracle illuminate the path forward and allow us to escape the darkness of denial.

Alan Solow is a former chair of the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations. The views expressed here are his own and are not those of any organization with which he has an association.

A message from our CEO & publisher Rachel Fishman Feddersen

I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s award-winning, nonprofit journalism during this critical time.

We’ve set a goal to raise $260,000 by December 31. That’s an ambitious goal, but one that will give us the resources we need to invest in the high quality news, opinion, analysis and cultural coverage that isn’t available anywhere else.

If you feel inspired to make an impact, now is the time to give something back. Join us as a member at your most generous level.

—  Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO

With your support, we’ll be ready for whatever 2025 brings.

Republish This Story

Please read before republishing

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free, unless it originated with JTA, Haaretz or another publication (as indicated on the article) and as long as you follow our guidelines. You must credit the Forward, retain our pixel and preserve our canonical link in Google search.  See our full guidelines for more information, and this guide for detail about canonical URLs.

To republish, copy the HTML by clicking on the yellow button to the right; it includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to the Forward. It does not include images; to avoid copyright violations, you must add them manually, following our guidelines. Please email us at editorial@forward.com, subject line “republish,” with any questions or to let us know what stories you’re picking up.

We don't support Internet Explorer

Please use Chrome, Safari, Firefox, or Edge to view this site.

Exit mobile version