Image by Scott Olson

By this point, we’ve been forced to acknowledge the existence of a certain group among Donald Trump supporters — a group that is arguably defined by white nationalism, bigotry, and all the worst undercurrents in American thought that helped bring Trump to power. That group, whether we like it or not (and, decidedly, this author does not) has become necessary to discuss on a national level. The question that arises, however, is “How?” Do we continue using their self-appointed moniker, the “alt-right”? Or do we call them out directly, opting for a title like “white nationalists” or “neo-Nazis”?

Thoughts on this subject have been generally divided into two camps:

Keep Calling Them Alt-Right

Forwarding the News

Thoughtful, balanced reporting from the Forward and around the web, bringing you updated news and analysis each day.

Terms(Required)

I agree to the Forward's Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

Email(Required)

• Julian Sanchez of the Cato Institute holds that, in purely practical terms, the term isn’t going anywhere, and that tip-toeing around it by grouping them with a historically broad moniker like “white nationalists” obfuscates rather than clarifies.
• Matthew Lyons, a writer concerned with “the struggle…against fascism,” believes that using the term “alt-right” to describe these people actually helps their opponents fight them, as they’ve made the term synonymous with overt bigotry with their own actions.
• Sarah Jones (supported by the ADL’s Mark Pitcavage) argues that using the term “alt-right” is not a sop to “white nationalists” — rather, it’s careful reporting about a specific group with specific goals and specific methods to achieve them.

Don’t Call Them Alt-Right

• Publications like ThinkProgress have announced that they will stop using the term “alt-right,” as have a large number of people on Twitter arguing that it normalizes bigotry and conceals the real, dangerous hatred behind the movement.
• Writer Lindy West asserts that, especially in the wake of the overtly neo-Nazi actions and ideas of group leaders like Richard B. Spencer, using the term “alt-right” is an act of denial and only serves the efforts to legitimize those actions and ideas.
• Noah Rothman of Commentary Magazine argues that using the term “alt-right” is objectionable from a conservative standpoint, as it implies that the group and its standpoint are valid options under the umbrella of conservatism in America.

This writer believes firmly in describing white nationalists, white supremacists, and neo-Nazis as such. Words are vectors that have the power to normalize or to repel, and now more than ever, it’s important to be clear about what’s acceptable and what’s unacceptable. Especially when dealing with such hateful and potentially violent ideologies, we need to know exactly what it is we’re dealing with.

Lana Adler is a Forward Summer Fellow working on opinion. Follow her on Twitter @Lana_Macondo

A message from our Publisher & CEO Rachel Fishman Feddersen

I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s award-winning, nonprofit journalism during this critical time.

The coming year promises to be filled with more complex and historic developments. We are entering an era where independent, fact-based Jewish journalism will be more important than ever. We need to be ready for whatever 2025 will bring, and with your help, we can be.

We’ve set a goal to raise $260,000 by December 31. That’s an ambitious goal, but one that will give us the resources we need to invest in the high quality news, opinion, analysis and cultural coverage that isn’t available anywhere else.

If you feel inspired to make an impact, now is the time to give something back. Join us as a member at your most generous level.

—  Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO

With your support, we’ll be ready for whatever 2025 brings.

$36 $500

$120 $180 Other amount