Skip To Content
JEWISH. INDEPENDENT. NONPROFIT.
Back to Opinion

This is a Sanctuary?

In just four days, at the end of this month, special benefits will run out for up to 4,600 refugees and assylees who fled persecution and affliction and were invited to live in America. These people are extremely poor, often disabled or very old, and because of that, they are unable to go through the process to become naturalized citizens.

So, they were given special dispensation to receive benefits from the Social Security Administration. But those benefits run out September 30. And all summer long, immigration advocates have been trying to get the attention of a few good people in Congress to extend benefits for this tiny, but very needy population.

In a Congress that won’t even offer disaster aid to its own citizens, you can imagine how well this humanitarian gesture is playing.

When I wrote about this last July, Senator Kirsten Gillibrand, the New York Democrat, was eager to wave the flag for these refugees and promised to push for an extension of benefits.

“As Americans, we are proud to offer sanctuary for those fleeing war, violence and persecution,” she said in a statement to the Forward. That was then. Now, Gillibrand’s office won’t return repeated phone calls and emails, and seems to have gone into hiding on the issue.

Senator Charles Schumer, the other New York Democrat, originally tried to get a 10-year extension of benefits, and figured out how to pay for it with an additional fee on visas, a plan which received the blessing of the Congressional Budget Office. But that solid fix also has been dropped, in favor of a one-year extension that needs to be approved in the next few days.

It bears repeating: These benefits are not for the “illegal aliens” so many politicians love to hate. They are not for people who somehow are refusing to become citizens. They are for poor, old, infirm refugees whom we have invited into our country, and who just need a little help from the federal government to survive. Why offer them sanctuary at all if we can’t do that?

A message from our CEO & publisher Rachel Fishman Feddersen

I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s award-winning, nonprofit journalism during this critical time.

We’ve set a goal to raise $260,000 by December 31. That’s an ambitious goal, but one that will give us the resources we need to invest in the high quality news, opinion, analysis and cultural coverage that isn’t available anywhere else.

If you feel inspired to make an impact, now is the time to give something back. Join us as a member at your most generous level.

—  Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO

With your support, we’ll be ready for whatever 2025 brings.

Republish This Story

Please read before republishing

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free, unless it originated with JTA, Haaretz or another publication (as indicated on the article) and as long as you follow our guidelines. You must credit the Forward, retain our pixel and preserve our canonical link in Google search.  See our full guidelines for more information, and this guide for detail about canonical URLs.

To republish, copy the HTML by clicking on the yellow button to the right; it includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to the Forward. It does not include images; to avoid copyright violations, you must add them manually, following our guidelines. Please email us at [email protected], subject line “republish,” with any questions or to let us know what stories you’re picking up.

We don't support Internet Explorer

Please use Chrome, Safari, Firefox, or Edge to view this site.