Skip To Content
JEWISH. INDEPENDENT. NONPROFIT.
Breaking News

Britain Adopts Anti-Semitism Definition That Decries Comparing Israel to Nazis

The British government is set to adopt a definition of anti-Semitism that includes calling Israel an inherently racist country and making comparisons between Israel and Nazi Germany.

British Prime Minister Theresa May agreed to adopt the definition that was recently introduced by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance, The Jewish Chronicle reported Monday.

The definition adopted by the Alliance, an intergovernmental agency of 31 Western nations, says anti-Semitism “might include the targeting of the State of Israel, conceived as a Jewish collectivity” though “criticism of Israel similar to that leveled against any other country cannot be regarded as anti-Semitic.”

The examples section of the definition includes classic forms of Jew hatred such as “stereotypical allegations about Jews as such” and spreading conspiracy theories about Jews, as well as calls to harm Jews.

The definition mentions Israel eight times, listing as examples behaviors such as “claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor” and “applying double standards by requiring of it [Israel] a behavior not expected or demanded of any other democratic nation.” Comparing Israel to Nazi Germany is also listed, along with “accusing the Jews as a people, or Israel as a state, of inventing or exaggerating the Holocaust.”

Moshe Kantor, president of the European Jewish Congress, in a statement said the adoption of the definition in Britain would fix “the absurd situation whereby anti-Semitism is defined by the perpetrators not by the victims, which makes it unique amongst all definitions of racism and xenophobia.” From now on, he added, the “perpetrators of anti-Semitism will be given clear red lines that they are not to cross and this is a very important development. We applaud and welcome this decision and call on other European states to follow suit.”

The impending adoption of the definition follows intense media scrutiny of the phenomenon in Britain, following what was widely perceived as expressions of anti-Semitism by senior members of the Labour Party. Amid the debate on this issue, Labour member and former London mayor Ken Livingstone said Adolf Hitler supported Zionism. He was suspended from Labour for that remark, though he said it was not anti-Semitic.

He also said that Naz Shah, a Labour senior lawmaker who in 2014 posted on Facebook a text calling for relocating Israeli Jews to the United States because of Washington’s support for Israel, had made no anti-Semitic statement by saying so. She was also suspended but has been reinstated after expressing regret for her statements.

The text of the Alliance’s definition of anti-Semitism closely resembles a document that had served as the European Union’s working definition of anti-Semitism before Brussels distanced itself from that working definition following lobbying and criticism by pro-Palestinian activists.

Adopted in 2005 by the European Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia – a body set up by the European Union to combat racism – it was removed in 2013 from the website of the Fundamental Rights Agency, the body that replaced the centre. A spokesperson for the agency told JTA the EU neither needed nor had a real definition for the phenomenon. She said the document had been pulled as part of maintenance work on the website.

In 2012, the prominent anti-Israel activist Ben White wrote on the website Electronic Intifada that the EU’s working definition’s “real agenda may be to stifle Palestine solidarity activism.”

A message from our CEO & publisher Rachel Fishman Feddersen

I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s award-winning, nonprofit journalism during this critical time.

We’ve set a goal to raise $260,000 by December 31. That’s an ambitious goal, but one that will give us the resources we need to invest in the high quality news, opinion, analysis and cultural coverage that isn’t available anywhere else.

If you feel inspired to make an impact, now is the time to give something back. Join us as a member at your most generous level.

—  Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO

With your support, we’ll be ready for whatever 2025 brings.

Explore

Most Popular

In Case You Missed It

Republish This Story

Please read before republishing

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free, unless it originated with JTA, Haaretz or another publication (as indicated on the article) and as long as you follow our guidelines. You must credit the Forward, retain our pixel and preserve our canonical link in Google search.  See our full guidelines for more information, and this guide for detail about canonical URLs.

To republish, copy the HTML by clicking on the yellow button to the right; it includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to the Forward. It does not include images; to avoid copyright violations, you must add them manually, following our guidelines. Please email us at editorial@forward.com, subject line “republish,” with any questions or to let us know what stories you’re picking up.

We don't support Internet Explorer

Please use Chrome, Safari, Firefox, or Edge to view this site.

Exit mobile version