Skip To Content
JEWISH. INDEPENDENT. NONPROFIT.
Breaking News

Israel Law Requires Referendum To Reverse Annexation of Golan or East Jerusalem

Israel’s parliament on Wednesday toughened a law requiring a public referendum on potential land-for-peace deals involving withdrawals from land annexed by Israel.

The law turns legislation already passed in 2010 into a constitutional amendment that would require an absolute majority of 61 of the Israeli Knesset’s 120 lawmakers to rescind.

“When it comes to making any such fateful decision, were such a moment to arrive, we must ask the people,” Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said, moments before the amendment passed by a vote of 68 to 0.

Opposition lawmakers from left-wing, Arab and ultra-Orthodox parties boycotted the vote, accusing Netanyahu’s government of rushing through a decision they see as controversial.

The law calls for a public vote to be held on any proposed peace deal in cases where the agreement calls for Israel to withdraw from land it has already annexed, such as East Jerusalem and the Golan Heights.

Such a plebiscite could be avoided if at least 80 Israeli lawmakers were to vote in favour of such a deal.

Israel made East Jerusalem a part of its capital after capturing it in a 1967 war, a move never recognised internationally. It annexed the Golan, land it captured from Syria in the same war, in 1981.

Netanyahu has pledged in the past to go further than the new law and call a general vote on any deal achieved with Palestinians, including any withdrawal from the West Bank – occupied territory where it has built settlements, but which it has not annexed.

Some Israelis, citing past broad public support for peace deals with Egypt and Jordan, see a referendum as boosting the prospects of U.S.-brokered talks with Palestinians. These have shown scant progress since resuming in July, though Washington says it is striving to publish a framework for a deal soon.

Some left-leaning Israelis say a referendum could add obstacles to already complicated negotiations and give pro-settler opponents of trading land for peace another opportunity to thwart a deal.

A message from our CEO & publisher Rachel Fishman Feddersen

I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s award-winning, nonprofit journalism during this critical time.

At a time when other newsrooms are closing or cutting back, the Forward has removed its paywall and invested additional resources to report on the ground from Israel and around the U.S. on the impact of the war, rising antisemitism and polarized discourse.

Readers like you make it all possible. Support our work by becoming a Forward Member and connect with our journalism and your community.

—  Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO

Join our mission to tell the Jewish story fully and fairly.

Republish This Story

Please read before republishing

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free, unless it originated with JTA, Haaretz or another publication (as indicated on the article) and as long as you follow our guidelines. You must credit the Forward, retain our pixel and preserve our canonical link in Google search.  See our full guidelines for more information, and this guide for detail about canonical URLs.

To republish, copy the HTML by clicking on the yellow button to the right; it includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to the Forward. It does not include images; to avoid copyright violations, you must add them manually, following our guidelines. Please email us at [email protected], subject line “republish,” with any questions or to let us know what stories you’re picking up.

We don't support Internet Explorer

Please use Chrome, Safari, Firefox, or Edge to view this site.