Skip To Content
JEWISH. INDEPENDENT. NONPROFIT.
News

After speaking with Jewish leaders, Sunrise Movement calls Zionist boycott ‘antisemitic’

The Sunrise Movement called its D.C. chapter’s boycott of three Jewish, Zionist organizations “antisemitic and unacceptable” in a statement Friday. Those comments came after the national organization’s previous comments on the local boycott were assailed as insufficient by the Jewish groups involved.

“Sunrise DC’s statement and actions are not in line with our values,” the Sunrise Movement said on Twitter. “Singling out Jewish organizations for removal from a coalition, despite others holding similar views, is antisemitic and unacceptable.”

The condemnation was quickly welcomed by the three organizations targeted by the boycott. Sheila Katz, chief executive of the National Council of Jewish Women, said she had met with the Sunrise Movement’s leadership Friday.

“It was a very productive dialogue and it resulted in an amended statement naming what happened as antisemitic,” Katz said.

Sunrise decided to more forcefully condemn the boycott after speaking with several progressive Jewish leaders Thursday and Friday, according to several people familiar with the process.

The controversy began when Sunrise DC announced on Tuesday that it had declined a speaking role at a voting rights rally planned for Saturday over the inclusion of three Jewish organizations with ties to Israel: The Religious Action Center of Reform Judaism, the Jewish Council on Public Affairs and the National Council of Jewish Women — three liberal members of the Jewish establishment which primarily focus on domestic politics.

On Thursday, the Sunrise Movement released a statement saying that it had not reviewed the D.C. chapter’s announcement and that it rejected “antisemitism and anti-Palestinian racism” and was willing to work with “anyone who acts on our principles,” including support for Palestinian rights.

But it did not explicitly disagree with the boycott of the three Jewish organizations. The Religious Action Center reacted with anger on social media, calling the Sunrise Movement’s statement “tepid” and “shameful.”

While the progressive movement is careful to emphasize that criticizing Israel and Zionism is not inherently antisemitic, many Sunrise DC critics on the left took issue with the fact that Sunrise DC appeared to only be boycotting Jewish groups with ties to Israel while ignoring other liberal rally sponsors with friendly ties to the country.

“Singling out explicitly Jewish organizations despite non-Jewish organizations in the coalition holding similar stances on Israel is unquestionably antisemitic and has no place in our movement,” Sunrise’s chapter at George Washington University said Thursday.

Some were dissatisfied with the implication from both Sunrise GW and the national movement that a boycott of all Zionist groups — as opposed to only the Jewish, Zionist organizations — would have been acceptable. Katz, with NCJW said that more education needed to be done around the relationship between anti-Zionism and antisemitism but that her priority was ensuring that Jews were not subject to a higher standard than other members of progressive coalitions.

“Jews shouldn’t be subject to a litmus test in order to be part of movements to advance human rights,” she said.

The spat came during a week when both the Jewish groups targeted by boycott and environmental groups like Sunrise, which is best known for promoting the Green New Deal, are scrambling to save President Joe Biden’s social services and infrastructure package in Congress.

“This is modeling good accountability. When our friends make bad choices, we call them in,” Phil Aroneanu, who directs strategy for the Jewish climate change group Dayenu, wrote on Twitter in response to the Sunrise statement. “Now let’s get out there and pass the #BuildBackBetterAct!”

A message from our CEO & publisher Rachel Fishman Feddersen

I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s award-winning, nonprofit journalism during this critical time.

At a time when other newsrooms are closing or cutting back, the Forward has removed its paywall and invested additional resources to report on the ground from Israel and around the U.S. on the impact of the war, rising antisemitism and polarized discourse.

Readers like you make it all possible. Support our work by becoming a Forward Member and connect with our journalism and your community.

—  Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO

Join our mission to tell the Jewish story fully and fairly.

Republish This Story

Please read before republishing

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free, unless it originated with JTA, Haaretz or another publication (as indicated on the article) and as long as you follow our guidelines. You must credit the Forward, retain our pixel and preserve our canonical link in Google search.  See our full guidelines for more information, and this guide for detail about canonical URLs.

To republish, copy the HTML by clicking on the yellow button to the right; it includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to the Forward. It does not include images; to avoid copyright violations, you must add them manually, following our guidelines. Please email us at editorial@forward.com, subject line “republish,” with any questions or to let us know what stories you’re picking up.

We don't support Internet Explorer

Please use Chrome, Safari, Firefox, or Edge to view this site.

Exit mobile version