Skip To Content
JEWISH. INDEPENDENT. NONPROFIT.
News

Disgruntled Synagogues Hold Back Confrontational Letter

A coalition of presidents from Conservative synagogues has agreed to refrain from sending a confrontational letter to the movement’s leadership, pending a face-to-face meeting within the next few weeks to discuss the presidents’ concerns.

The letter, to which a dozen synagogue presidents had committed as signatories, threatened rebellion or outright secession if the United Synagogue of Conservative Judaism, the congregational arm of the Conservative movement, did not make prompt and drastic changes to its organizational structure. It surfaced after a separate coalition of Conservative rabbis, cantors and lay leaders, known as Hayom, sent a letter that also demanded changes at the USCJ.

Robert Rubin, the treasurer of Congregation Adas Israel in Washington and one of the main coordinators of the presidents’ letter, attended a meeting held March 19 between the USCJ’s leadership and the leaders of Hayom. Pleased by the meeting and by a subsequent meeting with the USCJ’s international president, Raymond Goldstein, Rubin wrote to some 50 synagogue presidents who had shown interest in the letter, to tell them that Goldstein had committed to discussing the presidents’ concerns and that the letter, in turn, is not being sent.

“Given the positive nature of the Hayom meeting and the subsequent discussions with us, we have decided to withhold our letter, in order to engage in additional discussions with the USCJ on reform and value,” Rubin wrote to the synagogue presidents in an e-mail sent on March 23.

Rubin told the Forward that the decision to hold off on sending the letter had received a generally positive response and that roughly 70 synagogues were now interested in being involved with discussions going forward.

Goldstein said that he took the presidents’ move as a positive sign and that he expects to discuss concrete potential changes at the USCJ in the upcoming meeting.

“Since I haven’t seen the letter, we’ll need to understand the specifics and hopefully we can find a way to work together to bring that about,” Goldstein said. “We’ll go into that with open ears so we can hear their concerns and try to find some common ground.”

A message from our CEO & publisher Rachel Fishman Feddersen

I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s award-winning, nonprofit journalism during this critical time.

At a time when other newsrooms are closing or cutting back, the Forward has removed its paywall and invested additional resources to report on the ground from Israel and around the U.S. on the impact of the war, rising antisemitism and polarized discourse.

Readers like you make it all possible. Support our work by becoming a Forward Member and connect with our journalism and your community.

—  Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO

Join our mission to tell the Jewish story fully and fairly.

Republish This Story

Please read before republishing

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free, unless it originated with JTA, Haaretz or another publication (as indicated on the article) and as long as you follow our guidelines. You must credit the Forward, retain our pixel and preserve our canonical link in Google search.  See our full guidelines for more information, and this guide for detail about canonical URLs.

To republish, copy the HTML by clicking on the yellow button to the right; it includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to the Forward. It does not include images; to avoid copyright violations, you must add them manually, following our guidelines. Please email us at editorial@forward.com, subject line “republish,” with any questions or to let us know what stories you’re picking up.

We don't support Internet Explorer

Please use Chrome, Safari, Firefox, or Edge to view this site.

Exit mobile version