Life

The Limits Of ‘Lean In’ Empowerment

Sheryl Sandberg has the ear of Vice President Mike Pence and President Donald Trump. Image by Getty Images

By Phoebe Maltz Bovy April 2, 2017

In an interview with USA Today, Sheryl Sandberg, of Facebook fame, admitted that “[i]n terms of women in leadership roles, we are not better off” than four years ago, when her bestselling book “Lean In” was published. Sandberg does not appear to have turned away from the approach the book suggests, namely getting women to be more assertive (careful, but assertive. Her goal is still “that women run half our companies and countries and men run half our homes.” That said, personal experiences — specifically, the sudden death of her husband, Dave Goldberg — led her, she explains to USA Today, to a deeper understanding of single mothers’ challenges.

While it’s fair game to question the “Lean In” philosophy as a feminism for the masses (or even, evidently, for high-powered women professionals), it’s also important to remember that businesswomen face an expectation of enlightened, empowering politics that their male equivalents do not. In a Buzzfeed piece that briefly mentions Sandberg but focuses on other women entrepreneurs, Doree Shafrir offers a spot-on description of how women in business who make empowerment their brand wind up setting themselves (and their brands) up for failure:

The narratives of women like [Sophia] Amoruso [of Nasty Gal] and [Miki] Agrawal [of Thinx] — young, attractive, charismatic, and saying all the right things about the role of women in today’s workplace — are compelling, and these stories follow a pattern: These women are written about adoringly when they’re on their way up, because we want to root for them, because they challenge the notion that company founders need to be male and that workplaces can’t be feminist. Then, when they’re on their way down, the articles quoting disgruntled employees about their once-venerated feminist founders’ shortcomings come fast and furious, and people certainly seem to take a particular delight in reading them.

What I like so much about Shafrir’s piece is that it doesn’t simply add to the pile-on in question, but suggests instead that we look critically at all business leaders’ actions: “[I]t’s worth asking,” she writes, “why we’re so ready to lionize anyone — man, woman, or otherwise — just because they say all the right things.” That skepticism strikes me as appropriate and fair.

Phoebe Maltz Bovy edits the Sisterhood, and can be reached at [email protected]. She is the author of “The Perils Of ‘Privilege’”, from St. Martin’s Press. Follow her on Twitter, @tweetertation

Phoebe Maltz Bovy is a former editor of the Sisterhood blog at the Forward. Her writing has appeared in several publications, including The New Republic and The Atlantic. Her book, “The Perils of ‘Privilege,’” was published by St. Martin’s Press in March 2017. She has a PhD in French and French Studies from New York University, and has read a lot of 19th century French Jewish newspapers for a 21st century American.

A message from our Publisher & CEO Rachel Fishman Feddersen

I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s award-winning, nonprofit journalism during this critical time.

The coming year promises to be filled with more complex and historic developments. We are entering an era where independent, fact-based Jewish journalism will be more important than ever. We need to be ready for whatever 2025 will bring, and with your help, we can be.

We’ve set a goal to raise $260,000 by December 31. That’s an ambitious goal, but one that will give us the resources we need to invest in the high quality news, opinion, analysis and cultural coverage that isn’t available anywhere else.

If you feel inspired to make an impact, now is the time to give something back. Join us as a member at your most generous level.

— Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO