Skip To Content
JEWISH. INDEPENDENT. NONPROFIT.
Fast Forward

Meta asks for content moderation help with posts that say ‘all Israelis are criminals’

Sometimes, when users call a group of people criminals, they are referring to the government officials

(JTA) – Should social media users be allowed to call Israelis “criminals?” What if users are specifically talking about alleged war crimes by the Israeli government? 

Meta says not all cases are clear cut and that it needs help to make sure it’s striking the right balance between blocking hate speech and allowing the free expression of criticism.  The task falls to the Oversight Board, an independent group that oversees content moderation on Meta platforms Facebook, Instagram and Threads. 

The board will review three recent posts that Meta removed and consider recommending changes to Meta’s hate speech policies. In a post from January, a Threads user, replying to a video on the Israel-Hamas war, wrote, “All Israelis are criminals.” In December, a Facebook user writing in Arabic referred to Russians and Americans as “criminals.” In March someone commented on an Instagram post, “All Indians are rapists.”

All three cases were flagged for review by Meta’s automated systems, and the company ultimately concluded that all three violated its hate speech policy prohibiting attacks on groups of people on the basis of nationality. 

But there’s sometimes room for interpretation, especially during military conflict and other crises, because users are generally allowed to make claims of criminality against states or institutions, Meta told the board.

As it considers the case, the board is asking for the public to provide perspectives on the impact of Meta policies on the ability of users to speak out against actions by governments and the impact of posts calling an entire group of people “criminals.” The board also wants suggestions for criteria to distinguish between attacks on a group of people and attacks on institutions. 

It’s not the first time Meta’s has strained to apply its policies to real-life situations since the start of the war between Israel and Hamas in October. The board is currently evaluating whether the Palestinian rallying cry “from the river to sea” should be allowed on Meta’s platforms. 

This article originally appeared on JTA.org.

A message from our CEO & publisher Rachel Fishman Feddersen

I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s award-winning, nonprofit journalism during this critical time.

At a time when other newsrooms are closing or cutting back, the Forward has removed its paywall and invested additional resources to report on the ground from Israel and around the U.S. on the impact of the war, rising antisemitism and polarized discourse..

Readers like you make it all possible. Support our work by becoming a Forward Member and connect with our journalism and your community.

—  Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO

Join our mission to tell the Jewish story fully and fairly.

Republish This Story

Please read before republishing

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free, unless it originated with JTA, Haaretz or another publication (as indicated on the article) and as long as you follow our guidelines. You must credit the Forward, retain our pixel and preserve our canonical link in Google search.  See our full guidelines for more information, and this guide for detail about canonical URLs.

To republish, copy the HTML by clicking on the yellow button to the right; it includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to the Forward. It does not include images; to avoid copyright violations, you must add them manually, following our guidelines. Please email us at [email protected], subject line “republish,” with any questions or to let us know what stories you’re picking up.

We don't support Internet Explorer

Please use Chrome, Safari, Firefox, or Edge to view this site.