Skip To Content
JEWISH. INDEPENDENT. NONPROFIT.
Fast Forward

Netanyahu minister wants to revoke credentials of journalists critical of Israel

Prime Minister Netanyahu’s allies have advocated steps to put pressure on the independent media in Israel. Distal Atbaryan’s past attacks on the international press ‘could endanger reporters in Israel,’ says the foreign press association

This article originally appeared on Haaretz, and was reprinted here with permission. Sign up here to get Haaretz’s free Daily Brief newsletter delivered to your inbox.

Israeli Public Diplomacy Minister Galit Distal Atbaryan has mounted a concerted effort to gain control over the Government Press Office, stating in private conversations that she wanted the authority to deny press credentials to foreign journalists critical of Israel.

According to a Wednesday morning report by national broadcaster Kan, the Likud politician reached out to the Prime Minister’s Office Director General Yossi Shelley on multiple occasions to request that he transfer responsibility for the press office to her ministry but was repeatedly rebuffed.

She was also reported to have inappropriately pressured the Civil Service Commission to appoint an ally to a position within the press office.

The press office, usually referred to as the GPO by journalists, is tasked with managing coordination between the government and the press but has recently come under fire for acting beyond its jurisdiction to produce PR clips for politicians, including Distal Atbaryan.

Earlier this summer, the Foreign Press Association slammed the minister after she released a GPO-produced video decrying “fake” news from international media outlets.

Distal Atbaryan’s attacks on the international press “could endanger reporters in Israel,” the association, which represents hundreds of foreign correspondents in Israel, said in a statement, asserting that the use of such language “undermines the values of democracy and a free press.”

Responding to calls to take down the video, Distal Atbaryan tweeted that while Israel respects freedom of speech, as Minister of Public Diplomacy she would “not allow the biased coverage that is being conducted in our backyard to exist without an appropriate response.”

Since returning to power, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s allies have advocated a number of steps to put pressure on the independent media in Israel — including demanding a criminal investigation into a reporter over her social media posts.

Last month, Israeli journalists and news networks slammed a government-proposed overhaul of the country’s communications sector, stating that it would crush free media.

Communications Minister Shlomo Karhi’s proposals include the dissolution of the Cable and Satellite Council as well as the Second Authority of Television and Radio, which supervise television and radio broadcasts in Israel.

The overhaul would also see the cancellation of the requirement for networks to obtain licenses in order to broadcast news content, which the Israel Democracy Institute warned would open up the news to corporate pressure.

Such policies constitute an effort “to eliminate the press,” the Jerusalem Journalists Association said in a statement, protesting what it described as “severe damage to public broadcasting.” It predicted that under the new rules, there would be little separation between commercial and journalistic content.

Earlier this year, Karhi, who also threatened to halt government funding for advertising in Haaretz, announced his intention to close national broadcaster Kan – a plan which was put on hold while the government focuses on the judiciary.

Meanwhile, Likud lawmaker Boaz Bismuth, who previously worked as the editor-in-chief at the pro-Netanyahu free tabloid Israel Hayom, tabled a bill, which is no longer being actively promoted, aiming to prohibit the release of a recording that includes “sensitive” or “personal” information.

This legislation would, critics contend, have a chilling effect on the ability of the media to engage in investigative journalism, not least of those in positions of power.

And despite a number of high profile physical attacks on journalists, Justice Minister Yariv Levin has said he opposed any legislation to protect journalists from assault, because “Channel 12 and 13 journalists are propagandists, worse than in totalitarian states.”

A message from our CEO & publisher Rachel Fishman Feddersen

I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s award-winning, nonprofit journalism during this critical time.

We’ve set a goal to raise $260,000 by December 31. That’s an ambitious goal, but one that will give us the resources we need to invest in the high quality news, opinion, analysis and cultural coverage that isn’t available anywhere else.

If you feel inspired to make an impact, now is the time to give something back. Join us as a member at your most generous level.

—  Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO

With your support, we’ll be ready for whatever 2025 brings.

Republish This Story

Please read before republishing

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free, unless it originated with JTA, Haaretz or another publication (as indicated on the article) and as long as you follow our guidelines. You must credit the Forward, retain our pixel and preserve our canonical link in Google search.  See our full guidelines for more information, and this guide for detail about canonical URLs.

To republish, copy the HTML by clicking on the yellow button to the right; it includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to the Forward. It does not include images; to avoid copyright violations, you must add them manually, following our guidelines. Please email us at editorial@forward.com, subject line “republish,” with any questions or to let us know what stories you’re picking up.

We don't support Internet Explorer

Please use Chrome, Safari, Firefox, or Edge to view this site.

Exit mobile version