Skip To Content
JEWISH. INDEPENDENT. NONPROFIT.
Fast Forward

One State Or Two? Rambling Trump Sheds Little Light On Mideast Peace Plan.

President Trump offered bizarre mixed signals about his vision for Mideast peace Wednesday, telling Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu s he wants a two-state solution — but insisting hours later he is fine with a one-state solution.

“If the Israelis and the Palestinians want one state, that’s OK with me. If they want two states, that’s OK with me,” he said in a rambling afternoon press conference. “I’m happy if they’re happy.”

With trademark shrugs and eye-rolls, Trump appeared to have little grasp of the complexity of the Israeli-Palestinian peace process and made no effort to hide that he has no strong feelings about what path the U.S. should support.

He also gave an backhanded endorsement to son-in-law Jared Kushner, who is leading a stillborn effort to jumpstart stalled peace talks.

“Jared loves Israel,” Trump told reporters, before adding that he is trying to be a neutral mediator between Israel and the Palestinians.

Trump claimed he would unveil a new U.S. blueprint for peace in the next couple of months but did not explain why the rollout has already been repeatedly put off.

Earlier, Trump appeared to startle Netanyahu by proclaiming his support for a two-state solution after a meeting at the United Nations General Assembly.

“I like a two-state solution. That’s what I think works best … That’s my feeling,” said Trump.

Netanyahu has said any future Palestinian state must be demilitarized and must recognize Israel as the state of the Jewish people – conditions that Palestinians say show he is not sincere about any permanent solution to the conflict.

The United States’ Arab allies and the entire international community back a two-state solution, meaning a Palestinian state in the Israeli-occupied West Bank and Gaza.

A one-state solution would involve Israel permanently ruling over Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza, which presumably would include giving them full rights to vote.

Doubts have mounted over whether Trump can secure what he has called the “ultimate deal” as months go by with little serious effort to mount a peace effort.—Reuters

A message from our CEO & publisher Rachel Fishman Feddersen

I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s award-winning, nonprofit journalism during this critical time.

We’ve set a goal to raise $260,000 by December 31. That’s an ambitious goal, but one that will give us the resources we need to invest in the high quality news, opinion, analysis and cultural coverage that isn’t available anywhere else.

If you feel inspired to make an impact, now is the time to give something back. Join us as a member at your most generous level.

—  Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO

With your support, we’ll be ready for whatever 2025 brings.

Republish This Story

Please read before republishing

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free, unless it originated with JTA, Haaretz or another publication (as indicated on the article) and as long as you follow our guidelines. You must credit the Forward, retain our pixel and preserve our canonical link in Google search.  See our full guidelines for more information, and this guide for detail about canonical URLs.

To republish, copy the HTML by clicking on the yellow button to the right; it includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to the Forward. It does not include images; to avoid copyright violations, you must add them manually, following our guidelines. Please email us at editorial@forward.com, subject line “republish,” with any questions or to let us know what stories you’re picking up.

We don't support Internet Explorer

Please use Chrome, Safari, Firefox, or Edge to view this site.

Exit mobile version