Did Ta-Nehisi Coates Leave Twitter Because Of White Nationalists?
Richard Spencer and Ta-Nehisi Coates Image by Getty/Forward Montage
By Ari Feldman December 19, 2017
Ta-Nehisi Coates deleted his Twitter account Monday evening, and it may have been prompted by white nationalists.
Even Richard Spencer — the face of American white nationalism — eventually piled on the debate over an essay criticizing Coates’ new book.
Coates, a renowned public intellectual and a national correspondent for The Atlantic, was caught in a Twitter storm over the weekend after The Guardian published an essay criticizing his politics and relationship with Barack Obama. The essay by Cornel West, a socialist public intellectual and prominent critic of the Democratic Party, was widely shared across social media.
The essay, called “Ta-Nehisi Coates is the neoliberal face of the black freedom struggle,” accused Coates of ignoring the Obama administration’s use of drone warfare and suggested that Coates has a “preoccupation with white acceptance.” The essay was prompted by Coates’ new book, “We Were Eight Years In Power,” about the Obama administration.
The essay ignited the Twittersphere, with writers, academics and activists weighing in.
This @CornelWest attack on @tanehisicoates is personal vendetta masked as intellectual debate, and once again exposes his Obama obsession. If West’s true interest was “fightback,” which isn’t a word, then a broadside like this seems like a waste of time. https://t.co/D2z9N0XKnS
— Jamil Smith (@JamilSmith) December 17, 2017
Perhaps Ta-Nehisi Coates’ greatest failing as a public intellectual was choosing to disconnect the white supremacy he so brilliantly examines from the specific policies advanced by the Obama Administration. The omission spoke volumes, and compromised his analysis.
— Khaled Beydoun (@KhaledBeydoun) December 17, 2017
One of the strongest responses came from New Yorker writer Jelani Cobb, who criticized West harshly for praising Malcolm X in the Guardian essay, despite West’s ties with the Nation of Islam and its leader, Louis Farrakhan. Farrakhan said in 2000 that he “created the atmosphere that ultimately led to Malcolm X’s assassination.”
Honestly, I feel like it’s best to keep Malcolm’s name out your mouth if you running around with the dudes who killed him. Just talk about Paul Robeson instead or something.
— jelani cobb (@jelani9) December 18, 2017
As the debate wore on, Coates tweeted his articles to point to places where he had addressed things like drone warfare.
But West’s article soon began to take hold in white supremacist and white nationalist communities on Twitter. Coates responded with disbelief.
Image by twitter
He soon deleted his account.
Image by twitter
That evening, Richard Spencer retweeted West’s essay.
He’s not wrong. https://t.co/iQEaUhZNMd
— Richard ? Spencer (@RichardBSpencer) December 19, 2017
This was not the first time that Coates had suspended his Twitter account. He has questioned the usefulness of the social media platform for young journalists. But this appears to be the first time Coates has left Twitter after such a prominent intellectual spat.
After Coates’ account went inactive, several Twitter users responded with frustration — and pushed for further debate.
Glad the left is finally taking down one of its most important enemies: the guy who mainstreamed the idea of a mass transfer of wealth to African-Americans.
— Osita Nwanevu (@OsitaNwanevu) December 19, 2017
When Richard Spencer and Cornel West are in agreement, the analysis is amiss. One man can not be all things to all people. Instead of excoriating Ta-Nehisi, folks need to interrogate the system that propped him up as a lone, singular Black voice. https://t.co/kITnMdSmT8
— Evette Dionne ? (@freeblackgirl) December 19, 2017
Contact Ari Feldman at [email protected] or on Twitter @aefeldman
A message from our CEO & publisher Rachel Fishman Feddersen
I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s award-winning, nonprofit journalism during this critical time.
We’ve set a goal to raise $260,000 by December 31. That’s an ambitious goal, but one that will give us the resources we need to invest in the high quality news, opinion, analysis and cultural coverage that isn’t available anywhere else.
If you feel inspired to make an impact, now is the time to give something back. Join us as a member at your most generous level.
— Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO
