Does celebs’ Instagram boycott stand a chance of changing Facebook?
If you’ve noticed your Instagram feed is a little quieter than usual today, there’s a good reason.
As part of the activist movement Stop Hate for Profit’s “Week of Action,” over two dozen A-Listers are participating in a one-day Instagram “freeze” — meaning no pet pics, snaps of acai pudding or sun-dappled shots of infinity pools glimpsed over a Sally Rooney novel — all for a greater cause.
The Stop Hate movement, established by the NAACP, Color of Change and the ADL, was launched this summer to protest what ADL CEO Jonathan Greenblatt called Facebook’s “repeated failures” to curb hate speech and disinformation on its platforms and to pressure the social network to enact meaningful change. After a July summit with Mark Zuckerberg, leaders of Stop Hate for Profit weren’t convinced the CEO was ready to tackle the issue. The civil rights leaders and lawyers behind a concurrent independent civil rights audit wrote that they “disheartened, frustrated and angry” at Facebook’s lack of action on combatting discrimination and promoting equality.
While an earlier boycott on brand advertising singled out Facebook, this week’s celebrity action is appropriately concentrated on Facebook’s other major holding, Instagram, an app where artists of all stripes regularly engage their audiences. The participants include actor Michael B. Jordan, influencer Kim Kardashian West and comedians Amy Schumer and Sarah Silverman, all of whom have placed orange or black “Stop Hate” tiles on their feeds in lieu of new content or self-promotion.
Silverman pledged to shut down her social media for more than just one day, she wrote, “bc this shit’s crazy and y’all can live without dumb pics of my dog and me.”
Sacha Baron Cohen, the most outspoken celebrity advocate for the movement — and, via his keynote speech at last year’s ADL “Never is Now Summit,” its partial inspiration — launched a few volleys at Zuckerberg, including an image of his infamous Pagliacci-like sunscreen mask, before signing off.
There’s reason for doubt as to the move’s efficacy. While Facebook has long struggled to address the problem of hate and misinformation, it’s been consistently timid in its approach: A Washington Post exposé from June revealed that the social media giant’s algorithm was built to accommodate pages that push disinformation and hate, out of fear that a crackdown would have a lopsided effect on right-wing publishers.
But even if Facebook doesn’t get the message, Instagram’s millions of users will hopefully now become aware of the movement. It’s possible people’s love of celebrities — and desire to emulate them — might lead them to take their own steps to stop hate. In the meantime, we’ll miss Silverman’s dumb dog photos.
PJ Grisar is the Forward’s culture reporter. He can be reached at [email protected]
A message from our CEO & publisher Rachel Fishman Feddersen
I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s award-winning, nonprofit journalism during this critical time.
At a time when other newsrooms are closing or cutting back, the Forward has removed its paywall and invested additional resources to report on the ground from Israel and around the U.S. on the impact of the war, rising antisemitism and polarized discourse.
Readers like you make it all possible. Support our work by becoming a Forward Member and connect with our journalism and your community.
— Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO